A Remark on the Kelvin Transform for a Quasilinear Equation
Peter Lindqvist

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of the Kelvin transform's applicability to p-harmonic functions for various exponents p, highlighting its special case for p=2 and the absence of a general counterpart.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that the Kelvin transform cannot be generally extended to p-harmonic functions for arbitrary p, except in the linear case p=2.
Findings
Kelvin transform preserves p-harmonic functions only when p equals the space dimension.
No suitable generalization of the Kelvin transform exists for p ≠ 2.
The linear case p=2 uniquely allows the Kelvin transform to correct invariance issues.
Abstract
The p-harmonic functions are preserved under reflections in spheres only if the exponent p > 1 is equal to the dimension of the underlying Euclidean space. In the linear case p = 2 the Kelvin transform corrects this lack of invariance. We shall show that the Kelvin transform has no reasonable counterpart for general values of the exponent p.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Research and Discoveries · Elasticity and Wave Propagation · Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
