Precision Studies of Observables in pp->W->l nu and pp->gamma,Z->l+l- processes at the LHC
S. Alioli, A. B. Arbuzov, D. Yu. Bardin, L. Barze, C. Bernaciak, S. G., Bondarenko, C. Carloni Calame, M. Chiesa, S. Dittmaier, G. Ferrera, D. de, Florian, M. Grazzini, S. Hoeche, A. Huss, S. Jadach, L. V. Kalinovskaya, A., Karlberg, F. Krauss, Y. Li, H. Martinez, G. Montagna

TL;DR
This paper compares various Monte Carlo simulation codes for Drell-Yan processes at the LHC to enable high-precision electroweak measurements, focusing on NLO and NNLO accuracy and the combination of QCD and EW corrections.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates and compares public Monte Carlo codes for Drell-Yan processes, establishing a framework for precise electroweak observable predictions at the LHC.
Findings
Codes share at least NLO accuracy in total cross sections.
Comparison of NNLO QCD predictions shows agreement levels.
Discussion of higher-order effects and correction combinations.
Abstract
This report was prepared in the context of the LPCC "Electroweak Precision Measurements at the LHC WG" and summarizes the activity of a subgroup dedicated to the systematic comparison of public Monte Carlo codes, which describe the Drell-Yan processes at hadron colliders, in particular at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC). This work represents an important step towards the definition of an accurate simulation framework necessary for very high-precision measurements of electroweak (EW) observables such as the boson mass and the weak mixing angle. All the codes considered in this report share at least next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy in the prediction of the total cross sections in an expansion either in the strong or in the EW coupling constant. The NLO fixed-order predictions have been scrutinized at the technical level, using exactly the same inputs, setup and perturbative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
