Rejection of randomly coinciding events in Li$_2$$^{100}$MoO$_4$ scintillating bolometers using light detectors based on the Neganov-Luke effect
D.M. Chernyak, F.A. Danevich, L. Dumoulin, A. Giuliani, M. Mancuso, P., de Marcillac, S. Marnieros, C. Nones, E. Olivieri, D.V. Poda, V.I. Tretyak

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using Neganov-Luke light detectors with Li$_2$$^{100}$MoO$_4$ scintillating bolometers significantly reduces background noise from random coincidences of double-beta decay events, enhancing the sensitivity of neutrinoless double-beta decay searches.
Contribution
The study introduces a pulse-shape analysis method combined with Neganov-Luke light detectors to effectively discriminate against coincident background events in bolometric detectors for double-beta decay.
Findings
Achieved a pile-up rejection efficiency of ~99.994%
Reduced background contribution to ~6×10^{-5} counts/(keV·kg·y)
Demonstrated potential for large-scale neutrinoless double-beta decay experiments.
Abstract
Random coincidences of nuclear events can be one of the main background sources in low-temperature calorimetric experiments looking for neutrinoless double-beta decay, especially in those searches based on scintillating bolometers embedding the promising double-beta candidate Mo, because of the relatively short half-life of the two-neutrino double-beta decay of this nucleus. We show in this work that randomly coinciding events of the two-neutrino double decay of Mo in enriched LiMoO detectors can be effectively discriminated by pulse-shape analysis in the light channel if the scintillating bolometer is provided with a Neganov-Luke light detector, which can improve the signal-to-noise ratio by a large factor, assumed here at the level of on the basis of preliminary experimental results obtained with these devices. The achieved pile-up rejection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
