Computing Heegaard genus is NP-hard
David Bachman, Ryan Derby-Talbot, Eric Sedgwick

TL;DR
This paper proves that determining whether a 3-manifold has a Heegaard splitting of a given genus is an NP-hard problem, by reducing CNF-SAT to this problem in quadratic time.
Contribution
It establishes the NP-hardness of computing the Heegaard genus of 3-manifolds, a significant complexity result in geometric topology.
Findings
Heegaard genus decision problem is NP-hard.
Reduction from CNF-SAT demonstrates computational difficulty.
Provides a quadratic time reduction method.
Abstract
We show that {\sc Heegaard Genus }, the problem of deciding whether a triangulated 3-manifold admits a Heegaard splitting of genus less than or equal to , is NP-hard. The result follows from a quadratic time reduction of the NP-complete problem {\sc CNF-SAT} to {\sc Heegaard Genus }.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · semigroups and automata theory
