Multiplicity of Galactic Cepheids from long-baseline interferometry~III. Sub-percent limits on the relative brightness of a close companion of $\delta$~Cephei
A. Gallenne, A. Merand, P. Kervella, J. D. Monnier, G. H. Schaefer, R., M. Roettenbacher, W. Gieren, G. Pietrzynski, H. McAlister, T. ten Brummelaar,, J. Sturmann, L. Sturmann, N. Turner, R. I. Anderson

TL;DR
This study used long-baseline interferometry to set sub-percent limits on the brightness of a potential close companion to the Cepheid $\, ext{delta}$ Cephei, finding no strong evidence of such a companion within certain brightness and distance ranges.
Contribution
The paper provides the first high-precision interferometric constraints on the brightness and possible spectral type of a close companion to $\, ext{delta}$ Cephei, refining previous spectroscopic findings.
Findings
No strong evidence of a companion was detected.
Set upper limits on the companion's brightness and spectral type.
Ruled out companions earlier than F0V within specified ranges.
Abstract
We report new CHARA/MIRC interferometric observations of the Cepheid archetype Cep, which aimed at detecting the newly discovered spectroscopic companion. We reached a maximum dynamic range = 6.4, 5.8, and 5.2 mag, respectively within the relative distance to the Cepheid mas, mas and mas. Our observations did not show strong evidence of a companion. We have a marginal detection at with a flux ratio of 0.21\%, but nothing convincing as we found other possible probable locations. We ruled out the presence of companion with a spectral type earlier than F0V, A1V and B9V, respectively for the previously cited ranges . From our estimated sensitivity limits and the Cepheid light curve, we derived lower-limit magnitudes in the band for this possible companion to be and 7.77 mag,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
