Test of the no-signaling principle in the Hensen "loophole-free CHSH experiment"
Guillaume Adenier, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

TL;DR
This paper reanalyzes the Hensen loophole-free CHSH experiment data, revealing a significant violation of the no-signaling principle when the sample size is increased, challenging the original interpretation of the experiment.
Contribution
It uncovers a loophole in the original experiment and demonstrates that the no-signaling principle may be violated under certain data analysis conditions.
Findings
Violation of no-signaling principle with larger sample size
Original experiment's data analysis may overlook this loophole
Potential implications for quantum nonlocality tests
Abstract
We analyze the data from the loophole-free CHSH experiment performed by Hensen et al., and show that it is actually not exempt of an important loophole. By increasing the size of the sample of event-ready detections, one can exhibit in the experimental data a violation of the no-signaling principle with a statistical significance at least similar to that of the reported violation of the CHSH inequality, if not stronger.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
