Sampling methods for the quasistationary regime of epidemic processes on regular and complex networks
Renan S. Sander, Guilherme S. Costa, Silvio C. Ferreira

TL;DR
This paper compares various quasistationary simulation methods for epidemic processes on networks, analyzing their effectiveness in capturing phase transitions and localized epidemic phases, with implications for understanding epidemic thresholds.
Contribution
It introduces and evaluates three quasistationary methods, demonstrating their equivalence in epidemic threshold detection and their ability to capture localized phases in network models.
Findings
All methods yield the same epidemic threshold.
SQS and HR capture localized epidemic phases in SIS models.
Auto-correlation time analysis confirms consistent critical scaling.
Abstract
A major hurdle in the simulation of the steady state of epidemic processes is that the system will unavoidably visit an absorbing, disease-free state at sufficiently long times due to the finite size of the networks where epidemics evolves. In the present work, we compare different quasistationary (QS) simulation methods where the absorbing states are suitably handled and the thermodynamical limit of the original dynamics can be achieved. We analyze the standard QS (SQS) method, where the sampling is constrained to active configurations, the reflecting boundary condition (RBC), where the dynamics returns to the pre-absorbing configuration, and hub reactivation (HR), where the most connected vertex of the network is reactivated after a visit to an absorbing state. We apply the methods to the contact process (CP) and susceptible-infected-susceptible (SIS) models on regular and scale free…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
