Testing Hydrodynamics Schemes in Galaxy Disc Simulations
C. G. Few, C. Dobbs, A. Pettitt, L. Konstandin

TL;DR
This study compares three different hydrodynamics simulation codes in modeling galaxy discs, highlighting how their differences affect density structures and potential star formation predictions.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of adaptive mesh, SPH, and meshless codes in galaxy disc simulations, revealing how numerical schemes influence results.
Findings
RAMSES produces less dense, less vertically concentrated discs.
Higher resolution improves agreement between codes.
Differences in density distributions may affect star formation predictions.
Abstract
We examine how three fundamentally different numerical hydrodynamics codes follow the evolution of an isothermal galactic disc with an external spiral potential. We compare an adaptive mesh refinement code (RAMSES), a smoothed particle hydrodynamics code (sphNG), and a volume-discretised meshless code (GIZMO). Using standard refinement criteria, we find that RAMSES produces a disc that is less vertically concentrated and does not reach such high densities as the sphNG or GIZMO runs. The gas surface density in the spiral arms increases at a lower rate for the RAMSES simulations compared to the other codes. There is also a greater degree of substructure in the sphNG and GIZMO runs and secondary spiral arms are more pronounced. By resolving the Jeans' length with a greater number of grid cells we achieve more similar results to the Lagrangian codes used in this study. Other alterations to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
