Simultaneous VLBA polarimetric observations of the v=$\{$1,2$\}$ J=1-0 and v=1, J=2-1 SiO maser emission toward VY CMa II: component-level polarization analysis

TL;DR

This study compares polarized SiO maser emissions at multiple transitions toward VY CMa at high resolution to test theories of maser polarization transport, providing insights into magnetic field effects and polarization mechanisms.

Contribution

It offers a component-level polarization analysis across multiple SiO maser transitions, constraining models of polarized maser emission transport at milliarcsecond scales.

Findings

Support for spin-independent linear polarization solutions

Geometry influences fractional linear polarization distribution

Evidence for $ heta$-dependent polarization angle rotations

Abstract

This paper presents a component-level comparison of the polarized v=1 J =1-0, v=2 J=1-0 and v=1 J=2-1 SiO maser emission towards the supergiant star VY CMa at milliarcsecond-scale, as observed using the VLBA at $\lambda=7$mm and $\lambda=3$mm. An earlier paper considered overall maser morphology and constraints on SiO maser excitation and pumping derived from these data. The goal of the current paper is to use the measured polarization properties of individual co-spatial components detected across multiple transitions to provide constraints on several competing theories for the transport of polarized maser emission. This approach minimizes the significant effects of spatial blending. We present several diagnostic tests designed to distinguish key features of competing theoretical models for maser polarization. The number of coincident features is limited by sensitivity however, particularly in the v=1 J=2-1 transition at 86 GHz, and deeper observations are needed. Preliminary conclusions based on the current data provide some support for: i) spin-independent solutions for linear polarization; ii) the influence of geometry on the distribution of fractional linear polarization with intensity; and, iii) $\pi/2$ rotations in linear polarization position angle arising from transitions across the Van Vleck angle ($\sin^2{\theta}=2/3$) between the maser line-of-sight and magnetic field. There is weaker evidence for several enumerated non-Zeeman explanations for circular polarization. The expected 2:1 ratio in circular polarization between J=1-0 and J=2-1 predicted by standard Zeeman theory cannot unfortunately be tested conclusively due to insufficient coincident components.