Competing effects of Mn and Y doping on the low-energy excitations and phase diagram of La$_{1-y}$Y$_{y}$Fe$_{1-x}$Mn$_x$AsO$_{0.89}$F$_{0.11}$ iron-based superconductors
M. Moroni, S. Sanna, G. Lamura, T. Shiroka, R. De Renzi, R., Kappenberger, S. Wurmehl, A.U.B. Wolter, M.A. Afrassa, B. B\"uchner, P., Carretta

TL;DR
This study investigates how Mn and Y doping influence the low-energy excitations and phase diagram of La-Y-Fe-Mn-AsO-F superconductors, revealing competing effects on superconductivity and magnetism.
Contribution
It provides new insights into how chemical pressure from Y doping stabilizes superconductivity against Mn-induced suppression in iron-based superconductors.
Findings
Mn doping rapidly suppresses superconductivity at low concentrations.
Y doping enhances the robustness of superconductivity against Mn doping.
Magnetic correlations increase with Mn content, indicating a transition to a magnetic ground state.
Abstract
Muon Spin Rotation (SR) and F Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) measurements were performed to investigate the effect of Mn for Fe substitutions in LaYFeMnAsOF superconductors. While for a very low critical concentration of Mn (%) is needed to quench superconductivity, as increases the negative chemical pressure introduced by Y for La substitution stabilizes superconductivity and for % it is suppressed at Mn contents an order of magnitude larger. A magnetic phase arises once superconductivity is suppressed both for =0 and for %. Low-energy spin fluctuations give rise to a peak in F NMR with an onset well above the superconducting transition temperature and whose magnitude increases with . Also the static magnetic correlations probed by F NMR linewidth measurements show a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
