Revisiting the one leptoquark solution to the $R(D^{(\ast)})$ anomalies and its phenomenological implications

TL;DR

This paper revisits a scalar leptoquark model proposed to explain B-meson decay anomalies, analyzing how to distinguish among four solutions using various decay observables and current experimental constraints.

Contribution

It identifies which solutions are viable based on decay widths and explores how different observables can discriminate among the remaining solutions.

Findings

Two solutions are excluded by $B_c$ decay constraints.

Remaining solutions differ by a sign and slight coefficient variation.

Certain observables show sizable deviations from the SM, aiding discrimination.

Abstract

It has been shown recently that the anomalies observed in $\bar B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ and $\bar B\to \bar K\ell^+\ell^-$ decays could be resolved with just one scalar leptoquark. Fitting to the current data on $R(D^{(\ast)})$ along with acceptable $q^2$ distributions in $\bar B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ decays, four best-fit solutions for the operator coefficients have been found. In this paper, we explore the possibilities of how to discriminate these four solutions. Firstly, we find that two of them are already excluded by the decay $B_c^-\to \tau^-\bar\nu_\tau$, because the predicted decay widths have already overshot the total width $\Gamma_{B_c}$. It is then found that the remaining two solutions result in two effective Hamiltonians governing $b\to c \tau \bar\nu_{\tau}$ transition, which differ by a sign and enhance the absolute value of the coefficient of $\bar c_L\gamma_\mu b_L\,\bar \tau_L\gamma^\mu{\nu_\tau}_L$ operator by about $12\%$. However, they give nearly the same predictions as in the SM for the $D^\ast$ and $\tau$ longitudinal polarizations as well as the lepton forward-backward asymmetries in $\bar B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ decays. For the other observables like $\mathcal B(B_c^-\to \tau^-\bar\nu_\tau)$, $\mathcal B(B_c^- \to \gamma\tau^-\bar\nu_\tau)$, $R_{D^{(\ast)}}(q^2)$, ${\rm d}\mathcal B(\bar B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\bar\nu_\tau)/{\rm d}q^2$ and $\mathcal B(\bar B\to X_c\tau\bar\nu_\tau)$, on the other hand, the two solutions give sizable enhancements relative to the SM predictions. With measurement of $B_c^-\to \tau^-\bar\nu_\tau$ at LHCb and refined measurements of observables in $\bar B\to D^{(\ast)}\tau\bar\nu_\tau$ at both LHCb and Belle-II, such a specific NP scenario could be further deciphered.