Magnetar heating
Andrei M. Beloborodov, Xinyu Li (Columbia University)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates four potential mechanisms for magnetar surface heating, finding that core heating and crustal dissipation are insufficient for sustained luminosity, while magnetospheric bombardment and external heating are more plausible explanations.
Contribution
The study systematically assesses and compares four candidate heating mechanisms for magnetars, highlighting their viability and limitations based on observational and theoretical constraints.
Findings
Core heating can sustain observed luminosity if core magnetic fields are >10^{16} G.
Mechanical crustal heating is limited and unlikely to sustain high luminosity.
Magnetospheric bombardment can produce hot spots consistent with observations.
Abstract
We examine four candidate mechanisms that could explain the high surface temperatures of magnetars. (1) Heat flux from the liquid core heated by ambipolar diffusion. It could sustain the observed surface luminosity erg/s if core heating offsets neutrino cooling at a temperature K. This scenario is viable if the core magnetic field exceeds G and the heat-blanketing envelope of the magnetar has a light element composition. We find however that the lifetime of such a hot core should be shorter than the typical observed lifetime of magnetars. (2) Mechanical dissipation in the solid crust. This heating can be quasi-steady, powered by gradual (or frequent) crustal yielding to magnetic stresses. We show that it obeys a strong upper limit. As long as the crustal stresses are fostered by the field evolution in the core or Hall drift in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
