Visual Model Validation via Inline Replication
David Gotz, Brandon A. Price, Annie T. Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces Inline Replication, a nonparametric validation method for visual models that enhances the repeatability and reliability of insights derived from retrospective data visualizations.
Contribution
It presents a novel validation approach called Inline Replication, adaptable to various visualization techniques and data pipelines, improving the credibility of visual predictive models.
Findings
IR provides a nonparametric validation technique for visual models.
IR can be integrated into traditional and big data visualization workflows.
Examples demonstrate IR's application in common and complex visualization systems.
Abstract
Data visualizations typically show retrospective views of an existing dataset with little or no focus on repeatability. However, consumers of these tools often use insights gleaned from retrospective visualizations as the basis for decisions about future events. In this way, visualizations often serve as visual predictive models despite the fact that they are typically designed to present historical views of the data. This "visual predictive model" approach, however, can lead to invalid inferences. In this paper, we describe an approach to visual model validation called Inline Replication (IR) which, similar to the cross-validation technique used widely in machine learning, provides a nonparametric and broadly applicable technique for visual model assessment and repeatability. This paper describes the overall IR process and outlines how it can be integrated into both traditional and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
