Planets, debris and their host metallicity correlations
Mark Fletcher, Sergei Nayakshin

TL;DR
This paper compares the predictions of the Tidal Downsizing model with observations of debris discs and planetary systems, suggesting new correlations between debris presence, planet mass, and host star metallicity.
Contribution
It introduces the Tidal Downsizing scenario as an alternative to Core Accretion, explaining debris disc observations and predicting specific planet-debris correlations.
Findings
Debris disc presence does not correlate with host star metallicity.
High metallicity stars have fewer disruptions but more debris per disruption.
Sub-Saturn planets are more strongly correlated with debris discs than sub-Neptunes.
Abstract
Recent observations of debris discs, believed to be made up of remnant planetesimals, brought a number of surprises. Debris disc presence does not correlate with the host star's metallicity, and may anti-correlate with the presence of gas giant planets. These observations contradict both assumptions and predictions of the highly successful Core Accretion model of planet formation. Here we explore predictions of the alternative Tidal Downsizing (TD) scenario of planet formation. In TD, small planets and planetesimal debris is made only when gas fragments, predecessors of giant planets, are tidally disrupted. We show that these disruptions are rare in discs around high metallicity stars but release more debris per disruption than their low [M/H] analogs. This predicts no simple relation between debris disc presence and host star's [M/H], as observed. A detected gas giant planet implies in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
