Predict or classify: The deceptive role of time-locking in brain signal classification
Marco Rusconi, Angelo Valleriani

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that high classification accuracy in brain signal studies can result from time-locking effects rather than true predictive information about decisions, highlighting a potential misinterpretation in prior research.
Contribution
It introduces a stochastic model and information-theoretic analysis showing that time-locking can produce apparent predictive signals without actual decision-related information.
Findings
Classification accuracy can be above chance before decision time due to time-locking.
High accuracy is linked to the relaxation time of the neural process.
Time-locking influences the perceived timing of predictive signals.
Abstract
Several experimental studies claim to be able to predict the outcome of simple decisions from brain signals measured before subjects are aware of their decision. Often, these studies use multivariate pattern recognition methods with the underlying assumption that the ability to classify the brain signal is equivalent to predict the decision itself. Here we show instead that it is possible to correctly classify a signal even if it does not contain any predictive information about the decision. We first define a simple stochastic model that mimics the random decision process between two equivalent alternatives, and generate a large number of independent trials that contain no choice-predictive information. The trials are first time-locked to the time point of the final event and then classified using standard machine-learning techniques. The resulting classification accuracy is above…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
