Structural balance and opinion separation in trust-mistrust social networks
Weiguo Xia, Ming Cao, Karl Henrik Johansson

TL;DR
This paper investigates how structural balance influences opinion polarization in trust-mistrust networks, showing that balanced subnetworks lead to polarization and unbalanced ones neutralize opinions, with results applicable to both fixed and time-varying relationships.
Contribution
It extends existing research by analyzing opinion dynamics in networks with less restrictive connectivity and time-varying relationships, revealing conditions for polarization and neutralization.
Findings
Balanced mistrust subnetworks lead to opinion polarization.
Unbalanced subnetworks cause opinions to neutralize.
Results apply to both fixed and dynamic network models.
Abstract
Structural balance theory has been developed in sociology and psychology to explain how interacting agents, e.g., countries, political parties, opinionated individuals, with mixed trust and mistrust relationships evolve into polarized camps. Recent results have shown that structural balance is necessary for polarization in networks with fixed, strongly connected neighbor relationships when the opinion dynamics are described by DeGroot-type averaging rules. We develop this line of research in this paper in two steps. First, we consider fixed, not necessarily strongly connected, neighbor relationships. It is shown that if the network includes a strongly connected subnetwork containing mistrust, which influences the rest of the network, then no opinion clustering is possible when that subnetwork is not structurally balanced; all the opinions become neutralized in the end. In contrast, it…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
