The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: Biases in z>1.46 Redshifts due to Quasar Diversity
K. D. Denney (Ohio State), Keith Horne (University of St. Andrews), W., N. Brandt (Penn State), C. J. Grier (Penn State), Luis C. Ho (Kavli, Institute), B. M. Peterson (Ohio State), J. R. Trump (Penn State), J. Ge, (University of Florida)

TL;DR
This study reveals systematic biases in SDSS quasar redshift measurements at z>1.46 due to quasar diversity, showing that HeII-based redshifts can differ significantly from pipeline estimates, affecting interpretations of quasar properties.
Contribution
It introduces a method using HeII 1640 to identify biases in SDSS pipeline redshifts and demonstrates the variability of CIV blueshifts, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
HeII-based redshifts align with [OII] within uncertainties.
Significant biases exist in BOSS pipeline redshifts for some quasars.
CIV blueshifts vary widely, from negligible to thousands of km/s.
Abstract
We use the coadded spectra of 32 epochs of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Reverberation Mapping Project observations of 482 quasars with z>1.46 to highlight systematic biases in the SDSS- and BOSS-pipeline redshifts due to the natural diversity of quasar properties. We investigate the characteristics of this bias by comparing the BOSS-pipeline redshifts to an estimate from the centroid of HeII 1640. HeII has a low equivalent width but is often well-defined in high-S/N spectra, does not suffer from self-absorption, and has a narrow component that, when present (the case for about half of our sources), produces a redshift estimate that, on average, is consistent with that determined from [OII] to within 1-sigma of the quadrature sum of the HeII and [OII] centroid measurement uncertainties. The large redshift differences of ~1000 km/s, on average, between the BOSS-pipeline and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
