What can we really infer from GW 150914? (II)
J. F. Rodriguez, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini

TL;DR
This paper critically examines GW 150914, demonstrating that basic textbook formulas can estimate black-hole merger parameters without complex simulations, but emphasizes the need for independent observational constraints for accurate astrophysical inferences.
Contribution
It shows that simple, well-known formulas can be used to estimate black-hole merger parameters from gravitational-wave data, challenging reliance on complex simulations.
Findings
Basic formulas can estimate system parameters accurately.
LIGO data alone may not fully constrain astrophysical properties.
Independent observational constraints are necessary for reliable inferences.
Abstract
In a recent letter we have outlined some issues on GW 150914, we hereby give additional details. We analyze the event GW 150914 announced by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) as the gravitational-wave emission of a black-hole binary merger. We show that the parameters of the coalescing system and of the newly formed Kerr black-hole can be extracted from basic results of the gravitational-wave emission during the inspiraling and merger phases without sophisticate numerical simulations. Our strikingly accurate estimates are based on textbook formulas describing two different regimes: 1) the binary inspiraling analysis treated in Landau and Lifshitz textbook, 2) the plunge of a particle into a black-hole, treated in the Rees-Ruffini-Wheeler textbook as well as 3) the transition between these two regimes following Detweiler's treatment of a particle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
