When should an expert make a prediction?
Amir Ban, Yossi Azar, Yishay Mansour

TL;DR
This paper studies the optimal timing for an expert to reveal information in a prediction setting, characterizing the optimal policy, analyzing expected rewards, and providing an efficient algorithm.
Contribution
It introduces a threshold-based optimal policy for expert information revelation, links rewards to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm, and offers a dynamic programming solution.
Findings
Optimal policy is threshold-based.
Expected reward relates to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm.
Efficient algorithm computes the optimal policy.
Abstract
We consider a setting where in a known future time, a certain continuous random variable will be realized. There is a public prediction that gradually converges to its realized value, and an expert that has access to a more accurate prediction. Our goal is to study {\em when} should the expert reveal his information, assuming that his reward is based on a logarithmic market scoring rule (i.e., his reward is proportional to the gain in log-likelihood of the realized value). Our contributions are: (1) we characterize the expert's optimal policy and show that it is threshold based. (2) we analyze the expert's asymptotic expected optimal reward and show a tight connection to the Law of the Iterated Logarithm, and (3) we give an efficient dynamic programming algorithm to compute the optimal policy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Financial Markets and Investment Strategies · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
