Electron doping evolution of the neutron spin resonance in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_{x}$As
Chenglin Zhang, Weicheng Lv, Guotai Tan, Yu Song, Scott V. Carr,, Songxue Chi, M. Matsuda, A. D. Christianson, J. A. Fernandez-Baca, L. W., Harriger, and Pengcheng Dai

TL;DR
This study investigates how neutron spin resonance features evolve with electron doping in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As, revealing complex behavior linked to multi-orbital effects and impurity scattering across the superconducting phase diagram.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive doping-dependent analysis of neutron spin resonance in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As, highlighting the coexistence and evolution of multiple resonance modes.
Findings
Underdoped compositions show two coexisting resonance modes.
Increased doping shifts spectral weight from low to high-energy resonance.
Overdoped regime exhibits a single, broader resonance with stable energy despite reduced $T_c$.
Abstract
Neutron spin resonance, a collective magnetic excitation coupled to superconductivity, is one of the most prominent features shared by a broad family of unconventional superconductors including copper oxides, iron pnictides, and heavy fermions. In this work, we study the doping evolution of the resonances in NaFeCoAs covering the entire superconducting dome. For the underdoped compositions, two resonance modes coexist. As doping increases, the low-energy resonance gradually loses its spectral weight to the high-energy one but remains at the same energy. By contrast, in the overdoped regime we only find one single resonance, which acquires a broader width in both energy and momentum, but retains approximately the same peak position even when drops by nearly a half compared to optimal doping. These results suggest that the energy of the resonance in electron overdoped…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
