Rising from the Ashes: Mid-Infrared Re-Brightening of the Impostor SN 2010da in NGC 300
Ryan M. Lau, Mansi M. Kasliwal, Howard E. Bond, Nathan Smith, Ori D., Fox, Robert Carlon, Ann Marie Cody, Carlos Contreras, Devin Dykhoff, Robert, Gerhz, Eric Hsiao, Jacob Jencson, Rubab Khan, Frank Masci, L. A. G. Monard,, Andrew J. Monson, Nidia Morrell, Mark Phillips

TL;DR
This study investigates the mid-infrared re-brightening of SN 2010da in NGC 300, revealing dust production and proposing it as a supergiant B[e]-HMXB, challenging previous LBV eruption interpretations.
Contribution
The paper presents multi-epoch IR observations of SN 2010da, analyzing dust evolution, and reinterprets its nature as a sgB[e]-HMXB rather than an LBV eruption.
Findings
Mid-IR re-brightening indicates ongoing dust production.
SN 2010da's properties resemble known sgB[e]-HMXB systems.
High orbital eccentricity suggests a newly formed HMXB.
Abstract
We present multi-epoch mid-infrared (IR) photometry and the optical discovery observations of the "impostor" supernova (SN) 2010da in NGC 300 using new and archival Spitzer Space Telescope images and ground-based observatories. The mid-IR counterpart of SN 2010da was detected as SPIRITS 14bme in the SPitzer InfraRed Intensive Transient Survey (SPIRITS), an ongoing systematic search for IR transients. A sharp increase in the 3.6 m flux followed by a rapid decrease measured ~150 d before and ~80 d after the initial outburst, respectively, reveal a mid-IR counterpart to the coincident optical and high luminosity X-ray outbursts. At late times after the outburst (~2000 d), the 3.6 and 4.5 m emission increased to over a factor of 2 times the progenitor flux. We attribute the re-brightening mid-IR emission to continued dust production and increasing luminosity of the surviving…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
