(Modular) Effect Algebras are Equivalent to (Frobenius) Antispecial Algebras
Dusko Pavlovic (University of Hawaii), Peter-Michael Seidel, (University of Hawaii)

TL;DR
This paper establishes an equivalence between effect algebras and Frobenius antispecial algebras, revealing deep connections between quantum logic and categorical quantum mechanics, and offering new insights into quantum structures.
Contribution
It demonstrates that effect algebras and Frobenius antispecial algebras are mathematically equivalent, linking quantum logic laws with categorical quantum mechanics conditions.
Findings
Effect algebra units are each other's unique complements.
The modularity law corresponds to the Frobenius condition.
Effect algebras and Frobenius antispecial algebras are equivalent.
Abstract
Effect algebras are one of the generalizations of Boolean algebras proposed in the quest for a quantum logic. Frobenius algebras are a tool of categorical quantum mechanics, used to present various families of observables in abstract, often nonstandard frameworks. Both effect algebras and Frobenius algebras capture their respective fragments of quantum mechanics by elegant and succinct axioms; and both come with their conceptual mysteries. A particularly elegant and mysterious constraint, imposed on Frobenius algebras to characterize a class of tripartite entangled states, is the antispecial law. A particularly contentious issue on the quantum logic side is the modularity law, proposed by von Neumann to mitigate the failure of distributivity of quantum logical connectives. We show that, if quantum logic and categorical quantum mechanics are formalized in the same framework, then the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
