On the Sampling Strategy for Evaluation of Spectral-spatial Methods in Hyperspectral Image Classification
Jie Liang, Jun Zhou, Yuntao Qian, Lian Wen, Xiao Bai, Yongsheng Gao

TL;DR
This paper highlights the bias in evaluating spectral-spatial hyperspectral image classification methods due to improper sampling strategies and proposes a new controlled random sampling method to improve evaluation fairness.
Contribution
It introduces a novel controlled random sampling strategy that reduces sample overlap, enabling more objective assessment of spectral-spatial classification methods.
Findings
Traditional sampling methods can bias performance evaluation.
The proposed sampling strategy reduces overlap and bias.
Improves fairness and accuracy in method evaluation.
Abstract
Spectral-spatial processing has been increasingly explored in remote sensing hyperspectral image classification. While extensive studies have focused on developing methods to improve the classification accuracy, experimental setting and design for method evaluation have drawn little attention. In the scope of supervised classification, we find that traditional experimental designs for spectral processing are often improperly used in the spectral-spatial processing context, leading to unfair or biased performance evaluation. This is especially the case when training and testing samples are randomly drawn from the same image - a practice that has been commonly adopted in the experiments. Under such setting, the dependence caused by overlap between the training and testing samples may be artificially enhanced by some spatial information processing methods such as spatial filtering and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
