The Quality of the Covariance Selection Through Detection Problem and AUC Bounds
Navid Tafaghodi Khajavi, Anthony Kuh

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the quality of covariance selection in Gaussian graphical models by framing it as a detection problem, deriving bounds for AUC, and analyzing how model complexity affects approximation accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces the correlation approximation matrix (CAM) and analytically links AUC bounds with eigenvalues, providing new insights into model selection quality beyond KL divergence.
Findings
AUC bounds depend only on CAM eigenvalues.
Tree models' approximation quality deteriorates with increasing nodes.
1-AUC decays exponentially with model dimension.
Abstract
We consider the problem of quantifying the quality of a model selection problem for a graphical model. We discuss this by formulating the problem as a detection problem. Model selection problems usually minimize a distance between the original distribution and the model distribution. For the special case of Gaussian distributions, the model selection problem simplifies to the covariance selection problem which is widely discussed in literature by Dempster [2] where the likelihood criterion is maximized or equivalently the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is minimized to compute the model covariance matrix. While this solution is optimal for Gaussian distributions in the sense of the KL divergence, it is not optimal when compared with other information divergences and criteria such as Area Under the Curve (AUC). In this paper, we analytically compute upper and lower bounds for the AUC…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsClass-activation map
