Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations
Jessie L. Christiansen, Bruce D. Clarke, Christopher J. Burke, Jon M., Jenkins, Stephen T. Bryson, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Fergal Mullally, Susan E., Thompson, Joseph D. Twicken, Natalie M. Batalha, Michael R. Haas, Joseph, Catanzarite, Jennifer R. Campbell, AKM Kamal Uddin

TL;DR
This study evaluates the detection efficiency of the Kepler pipeline version 9.2 by injecting simulated planets into data, revealing a strong period dependence and providing insights for accurate exoplanet occurrence rate calculations.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed measurement of the Kepler pipeline's sensitivity, highlighting period-dependent detection efficiency and offering guidance for occurrence rate analyses.
Findings
Detection efficiency decreases for periods longer than 40 days.
Pipeline sensitivity varies with planet signal strength and period.
Recommendations for accurate occurrence rate calculations are provided.
Abstract
With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (>40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
