New analytical solutions for chemical evolution models: characterizing the population of star-forming and passive galaxies
E. Spitoni, F. Vincenzo, F. Matteucci

TL;DR
This paper introduces new analytical solutions for chemical evolution models of galaxies, applying them to SDSS data to distinguish properties of star-forming and passive galaxies, and exploring the impact of initial mass functions on their evolution.
Contribution
The work provides novel analytical solutions for galaxy chemical evolution with inflow and outflow, and applies these to observational data to characterize galaxy populations and their evolutionary differences.
Findings
Passive galaxies are older and have shorter formation timescales.
Larger star-forming galaxies are older and have longer formation timescales.
Star-forming galaxies exhibit stronger galactic winds than passive ones.
Abstract
Analytical models of chemical evolution, including inflow and outflow of gas, are important tools to study how the metal content in galaxies evolves as a function of time. In this work, we present new analytical solutions for the evolution of the gas mass, total mass and metallicity of a galactic system, when a decaying exponential infall rate of gas and galactic winds are assumed. We apply our model to characterize a sample of local star-forming and passive galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data, with the aim of reproducing their observed mass-metallicity relation; in this way, we can derive how the two populations of star-forming and passive galaxies differ in their particular distribution of ages, formation time scales, infall masses and mass loading factors. We find that the local passive galaxies are on average older and assembled on shorter typical time-scales than the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
