Strong Ramsey Games: Drawing on an infinite board

TL;DR

This paper constructs a specific hypergraph for an infinite game where neither player can force a win, contrasting with finite cases where the first player can always win given enough vertices.

Contribution

It demonstrates the existence of a hypergraph game on an infinite board that results in a draw, unlike finite games where the first player can guarantee a win.

Findings

A hypergraph exists where the infinite game is a draw.

Finite games favor the first player with large enough boards.

Strategy stealing guarantees a win in finite games for large enough n.

Abstract

We consider the strong Ramsey-type game $\mathcal{R}^{(k)}(\mathcal{H}, \aleph_0)$, played on the edge set of the infinite complete $k$-uniform hypergraph $K^k_{\mathbb{N}}$. Two players, called FP (the first player) and SP (the second player), take turns claiming edges of $K^k_{\mathbb{N}}$ with the goal of building a copy of some finite predetermined $k$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$. The first player to build a copy of $\mathcal{H}$ wins. If no player has a strategy to ensure his win in finitely many moves, then the game is declared a draw. In this paper, we construct a $5$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ such that $\mathcal{R}^{(5)}(\mathcal{H}, \aleph_0)$ is a draw. This is in stark contrast to the corresponding finite game $\mathcal{R}^{(5)}(\mathcal{H}, n)$, played on the edge set of $K^5_n$. Indeed, using a classical game-theoretic argument known as \emph{strategy stealing} and a Ramsey-type argument, one can show that for every $k$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{G}$, there exists an integer $n_0$ such that FP has a winning strategy for $\mathcal{R}^{(k)}(\mathcal{G}, n)$ for every $n \geq n_0$.