Are Maxwell's equations Lorentz-covariant?
D V Redzic

TL;DR
This paper examines whether Maxwell's equations are inherently Lorentz-covariant or if they require specific transformation properties to exhibit covariance, clarifying the distinction between potentiality and actual covariance.
Contribution
It clarifies that Maxwell's equations are capable of being Lorentz-covariant when appropriate transformation properties are postulated, distinguishing potentiality from actual covariance.
Findings
Maxwell's equations are compatible with Lorentz covariance
Covariance depends on postulated transformation properties
The covariance is a potentiality, not an inherent feature
Abstract
The statement that Maxwell's electrodynamics in vacuum is already covariant under Lorentz transformations is commonplace in the literature. We analyse the actual meaning of that statement and demonstrate that Maxwell's equations are perfectly fit to be Lorentz-covariant; they become Lorentz-covariant if we construct to be so, by postulating certain transformation properties of field functions. In Aristotelian terms, the covariance is a plain potentiality, but not necessarily entelechy.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
