Wrong-Way Risk Models: A Comparison of Analytical Exposures
Fr\'ed\'eric Vrins

TL;DR
This paper compares static and dynamic models for wrong-way risk in CVA, introducing a new approach using the $ ext{Azé}$-martingale, and derives analytical positive exposure profiles for different market processes.
Contribution
It introduces a new dynamic modeling approach for wrong-way risk using the $ ext{Azé}$-martingale and provides analytical expressions for positive exposures.
Findings
All models allow calibration to default probability curves.
Explicit formulas for positive exposures are derived for prototypical market processes.
The process $ ext{zeta}$ is positive with unit expectation but not a martingale.
Abstract
In this paper, we compare static and dynamic (reduced form) approaches for modeling wrong-way risk in the context of CVA. Although all these approaches potentially suffer from arbitrage problems, they are popular (respectively) in industry and academia, mainly due to analytical tractability reasons. We complete the stochastic intensity models with another dynamic approach, consisting in the straight modeling of the survival (Az\'ema supermartingale) process using the -martingale. Just like the other approaches, this method allows for automatic calibration to a given default probability curve. We derive analytically the positive exposures "conditional upon default" associated to prototypical market price processes of FRA and IRS in all cases. We further discuss the link between the "default" condition and change-of-measure techniques. The expectation of conditional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCredit Risk and Financial Regulations · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Probability and Risk Models
