Chromospheric heating by acoustic waves compared to radiative cooling
M. Sobotka, P. Heinzel, M. \v{S}vanda, J. Jur\v{c}\'ak, D. del Moro,, and F. Berrilli

TL;DR
This study compares acoustic wave energy deposition with radiative cooling in the solar chromosphere, finding that acoustic waves significantly contribute to heating, especially in active regions, though their overall impact varies.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed spatial comparison of acoustic flux and radiative losses in a solar plage, highlighting the potential dominance of acoustic heating in certain chromospheric areas.
Findings
Acoustic flux correlates with radiative losses at 72% spatially.
In quiet chromosphere, acoustic contribution is about 15%.
In active regions, acoustic contribution ranges from 23% to 54%.
Abstract
Acoustic and magnetoacoustic waves are among the possible candidate mechanisms that heat the upper layers of solar atmosphere. A weak chromospheric plage near a large solar pore NOAA 11005 was observed on October 15, 2008 in the lines Fe I 617.3 nm and Ca II 853.2 nm with the Interferometric Bidimemsional Spectrometer (IBIS) attached to the Dunn Solar Telescope. Analyzing the Ca II observations with spatial and temporal resolutions of 0.4" and 52 s, the energy deposited by acoustic waves is compared with that released by radiative losses. The deposited acoustic flux is estimated from power spectra of Doppler oscillations measured in the Ca II line core. The radiative losses are calculated using a grid of seven 1D hydrostatic semi-empirical model atmospheres. The comparison shows that the spatial correlation of maps of radiative losses and acoustic flux is 72 %. In quiet chromosphere,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
