On the problem of non-zero word error rates for fixed-rate error correction codes in continuous variable quantum key distribution
Sarah J. Johnson, Andrew M. Lance, Lawrence Ong, Mahyar, Shirvanimoghaddam, T. C. Ralph, Thomas Symul

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the assumptions behind error correction codes in continuous variable quantum key distribution, revealing fundamental flaws in existing models and proposing a more accurate perspective on key rate calculations.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that current secret key rate models are incorrect for fixed-rate codes and introduces a post-selection approach for more realistic error correction analysis.
Findings
Fixed-rate error correction codes can have efficiencies greater than one.
Current models suggest positive key rates over entanglement breaking channels, which is impossible.
A post-selection perspective constrains key rate analysis to low error rates.
Abstract
The maximum operational range of continuous variable quantum key distribution protocols has shown to be improved by employing high-efficiency forward error correction codes. Typically, the secret key rate model for such protocols is modified to account for the non-zero word error rate of such codes. In this paper, we demonstrate that this model is incorrect: Firstly, we show by example that fixed-rate error correction codes, as currently defined, can exhibit efficiencies greater than unity. Secondly, we show that using this secret key model combined with greater than unity efficiency codes, implies that it is possible to achieve a positive secret key over an entanglement breaking channel - an impossible scenario. We then consider the secret key model from a post-selection perspective, and examine the implications for key rate if we constrain the forward error correction codes to operate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
