Rate region boundary of the SISO Z-interference channel with improper signaling
Christian Lameiro, Ignacio Santamaria, Peter J. Schreier

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the boundary of the achievable rate region for the SISO Z-interference channel using improper Gaussian signaling, providing conditions for optimality and insights into when impropriety enhances performance.
Contribution
It offers a complete characterization of the Pareto boundary with improper signaling, including a necessary and sufficient condition for optimality and a closed-form expression for the circularity coefficient.
Findings
Improper signaling can outperform proper signaling under certain interference conditions.
A threshold on the interference channel coefficient determines the optimality of improper signaling.
Closed-form expression for the optimal circularity coefficient is derived.
Abstract
This paper provides a complete characterization of the boundary of an achievable rate region, called the Pareto boundary, of the single-antenna Z interference channel (Z-IC), when interference is treated as noise and users transmit complex Gaussian signals that are allowed to be improper. By considering the augmented complex formulation, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition for improper signaling to be optimal. This condition is stated as a threshold on the interference channel coefficient, which is a function of the interfered user rate and which allows insightful interpretations into the behavior of the achievable rates in terms of the circularity coefficient (i.e., degree of impropriety). Furthermore, the optimal circularity coefficient is provided in closed form. The simplicity of the obtained characterization permits interesting insights into when and how improper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
