On falsification of the binary instrumental variable model
Linbo Wang, James M. Robins, Thomas S. Richardson

TL;DR
This paper develops formal statistical tests for the validity of binary instrumental variable models, addressing a gap where current assessments rely mainly on subject-matter arguments.
Contribution
It introduces simple procedures based on existing treatment comparison tests to evaluate instrumental variable validity with known statistical properties.
Findings
Proposed tests can effectively falsify invalid instruments.
Application to college proximity data demonstrates practical utility.
Highlights importance of formal testing over subjective assessments.
Abstract
Instrumental variables are widely used for estimating causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. The discrete instrumental variable model has testable implications on the law of the observed data. However, current assessments of instrumental validity are typically based solely on subject-matter arguments rather than these testable implications, partly due to a lack of formal statistical tests with known properties. In this paper, we develop simple procedures for testing the binary instrumental variable model. Our methods are based on existing approaches for comparing two treatments, such as the t-test and the Gail--Simon test. We illustrate the importance of testing the instrumental variable model by evaluating the exogeneity of college proximity using the National Longitudinal Survey of Young Men.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
