An achromatic break in the afterglow of the short GRB 140903A: evidence for a narrow jet
E. Troja, T. Sakamoto, S. B. Cenko, A. Lien, N. Gehrels, A. J., Castro-Tirado, R. Ricci, J. Capone, V. Toy, A. Kutyrev, N. Kawai, A., Cucchiara, A. Fruchter, J. Gorosabel, S. Jeong, A. Levan, D. Perley, R., Sanchez-Ramirez, N. Tanvir, S. Veilleux

TL;DR
This study presents evidence for a narrow jet in the short GRB 140903A through multi-wavelength afterglow observations, deriving a jet opening angle of 5 degrees and supporting a compact binary merger origin.
Contribution
The paper provides the first detailed analysis of an achromatic break in a short GRB afterglow, estimating jet parameters and discussing progenitor implications.
Findings
Detected a steepening in X-ray afterglow decay after 1 day.
Derived a jet opening angle of approximately 5 degrees.
Supported a compact binary merger as the GRB progenitor.
Abstract
We report the results of our observing campaign on GRB140903A, a nearby (z=0.351) short duration (T90~0.3 s) gamma-ray burst discovered by Swift. We monitored the X-ray afterglow with Chandra up to 21 days after the burst, and detected a steeper decay of the X-ray flux after approximately 1 day. Continued monitoring at optical and radio wavelengths showed a similar decay in flux at nearly the same time, and we interpret it as evidence of a narrowly collimated jet. By using the standard fireball model to describe the afterglow evolution, we derive a jet opening angle of 5 deg and a collimation-corrected total energy release of 2E50 erg. We further discuss the nature of the GRB progenitor system. Three main lines disfavor a massive star progenitor: the properties of the prompt gamma-ray emission, the age and low star-formation rate of the host galaxy, and the lack of a bright supernova.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
