Planck intermediate results. XLVII. Planck constraints on reionization history
Planck Collaboration: R. Adam, N. Aghanim, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C., Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S., Basak, R. Battye, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz, J., J. Bock, A. Bonaldi, L. Bonavera, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill

TL;DR
This paper uses Planck CMB data to constrain the history and timing of cosmic reionization, finding a low optical depth and ruling out very early reionization onset, thus refining our understanding of the epoch.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on reionization history using Planck data combined with kSZ measurements, improving previous estimates and reducing uncertainties.
Findings
Thomson optical depth tau=0.058 +/- 0.012
Reionization occurred between redshifts 7.8 and 8.8
Early reionization onset is strongly disfavoured
Abstract
We investigate constraints on cosmic reionization extracted from the Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. We combine the Planck CMB anisotropy data in temperature with the low-multipole polarization data to fit LCDM models with various parameterizations of the reionization history. We obtain a Thomson optical depth tau=0.058 +/- 0.012 for the commonly adopted instantaneous reionization model. This confirms, with only data from CMB anisotropies, the low value suggested by combining Planck 2015 results with other data sets and also reduces the uncertainties. We reconstruct the history of the ionization fraction using either a symmetric or an asymmetric model for the transition between the neutral and ionized phases. To determine better constraints on the duration of the reionization process, we also make use of measurements of the amplitude of the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich (kSZ)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
