Reionisation in sterile neutrino cosmologies
Sownak Bose (1), Carlos S. Frenk (1), Hou Jun (1), Cedric G. Lacey, (1), Mark R. Lovell (2) ((1) ICC, Durham, (2) GRAPPA, Amsterdam)

TL;DR
This study explores how sterile neutrino warm dark matter models influence the epoch of reionisation, showing they can reionise the universe early enough and align with observational bounds, while also constraining model viability with satellite galaxy data.
Contribution
It demonstrates that sterile neutrino warm dark matter models can produce early reionisation consistent with observations and provides constraints based on satellite galaxy luminosity functions.
Findings
Sterile neutrino models can reionise the universe early enough to match Planck bounds.
High-redshift galaxy build-up is faster in sterile neutrino models than in CDM.
Satellite galaxy luminosity functions constrain sterile neutrino model parameters.
Abstract
We investigate the process of reionisation in a model in which the dark matter is a warm elementary particle such as a sterile neutrino. We focus on models that are consistent with the dark matter decay interpretation of the recently detected line at 3.5 keV in the X-ray spectra of galaxies and clusters. In warm dark matter models the primordial spectrum of density perturbations has a cut-off on the scale of dwarf galaxies. Structure formation therefore begins later than in the standard cold dark matter (CDM) model and very few objects form below the cut-off mass scale. To calculate the number of ionising photons, we use the Durham semi-analytic model of galaxy formation, GALFORM. We find that even the most extreme 7 keV sterile neutrino we consider is able to reionise the Universe early enough to be compatible with the bounds on the epoch of reionisation from Planck. This, perhaps…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
