Cosmic-ray energy spectrum and composition up to the ankle - the case for a second Galactic component
S. Thoudam, J.P. Rachen, A. van Vliet, A. Achterberg, S. Buitink, H., Falcke, J.R. H\"orandel

TL;DR
This paper proposes a two-component Galactic cosmic ray model, including re-acceleration or Wolf-Rayet star explosions, to explain the spectrum and composition up to 10^18 eV, aligning with recent observations of light nuclei dominance.
Contribution
It introduces a novel two-component Galactic model that accounts for the spectrum and composition up to the second knee, incorporating Wolf-Rayet star explosions as a key source.
Findings
A second Galactic component explains the spectrum above 2x10^16 eV.
The model predicts a light composition dominated by helium and CNO nuclei.
Observations from LOFAR and Pierre Auger support the light composition prediction.
Abstract
We have carried out a detailed study to understand the observed energy spectrum and composition of cosmic rays with energies up to ~10^18 eV. Our study shows that a single Galactic component with subsequent energy cut-offs in the individual spectra of different elements, optimised to explain the observed spectra below ~10^14 eV and the knee in the all-particle spectrum, cannot explain the observed all-particle spectrum above ~2x10^16 eV. We discuss two approaches for a second component of Galactic cosmic rays -- re-acceleration at a Galactic wind termination shock, and supernova explosions of Wolf-Rayet stars, and show that the latter scenario can explain almost all observed features in the all-particle spectrum and the composition up to ~10^18 eV, when combined with a canonical extra-galactic spectrum expected from strong radio galaxies or a source population with similar cosmological…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
