What is Physics: The individual and the universal, and seeing past the noise
A. R. P. Rau

TL;DR
This paper discusses how physics fundamentally describes universal systems and properties, emphasizing that individual objects or events are approximations and that true physics pertains to the collective, not the specific, individual entities.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinction between the universal nature of physical laws and the illusory individuality of objects, criticizing multiverse explanations and emphasizing the importance of the universal perspective.
Findings
Physics predicts distributions, not individual outcomes.
Individual objects are approximations, not fundamental entities.
Misinterpreting the universal as individual leads to incoherent theories.
Abstract
Along with weaving together observations, experiments, and theoretical constructs into a coherent mesh of understanding of the world around us, physics over its past five centuries has continuously refined the base concepts on which the whole framework is built. In quantum physics, first in non-relativistic mechanics and later in quantum field theories, even familiar concepts of position, momentum, wave or particle, are derived constructs from the classical limit in which we live but not intrinsic to the underlying physics. Most crucially, the very idea of the individual, whether an object or an event, distinguished only in a mere label of identity from others identical to it in all the physics, exists only as an approximation, not an element of underlying reality. Failure to recognize this and seeking alternative explanations in many worlds or multiverses leads only to incoherent logic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
