This House Proves that Debating is Harder than Soccer
Stefan Neumann, Andreas Wiese

TL;DR
This paper investigates the computational complexity of determining whether a team can win or qualify in debating tournaments, revealing NP-hardness in some cases and fixed parameter tractability in others, contrasting with simpler sports like football.
Contribution
It proves NP-hardness for debating league outcomes with four teams per game and shows fixed parameter tractability for common tournament scenarios, extending complexity analysis beyond traditional sports.
Findings
NP-hardness for debating leagues with four teams per game
Fixed parameter tractability when remaining rounds are limited
Polynomial time solvability for fixed number of remaining rounds
Abstract
During the last twenty years, a lot of research was conducted on the sport elimination problem: Given a sports league and its remaining matches, we have to decide whether a given team can still possibly win the competition, i.e., place first in the league at the end. Previously, the computational complexity of this problem was investigated only for games with two participating teams per game. In this paper we consider Debating Tournaments and Debating Leagues in the British Parliamentary format, where four teams are participating in each game. We prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a given team can win a Debating League, even if at most two matches are remaining for each team. This contrasts settings like football where two teams play in each game since there this case is still polynomial time solvable. We prove our result even for a fictitious restricted setting with only three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Auction Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems
