Evidence for a correlation between mass accretion rates onto young stars and the mass of their protoplanetary disks
C. F. Manara, G. Rosotti, L. Testi, A. Natta, J. M. Alcal\'a, J. P., Williams, M. Ansdell, A. Miotello, N. van der Marel, M. Tazzari, J., Carpenter, G. Guidi, G. S. Mathews, I. Oliveira, T. Prusti, E. F. van, Dishoeck

TL;DR
This study provides observational evidence linking mass accretion rates onto young stars with the dust mass of their protoplanetary disks, supporting viscous accretion theory predictions.
Contribution
It presents the first homogeneous dataset combining VLT/X-Shooter and ALMA observations to test the correlation between accretion rates and disk mass in young stars.
Findings
A confirmed correlation between accretion rate and disk dust mass.
No significant correlation between accretion rate and CO-based disk mass.
Disk dust mass aligns with viscous timescale predictions.
Abstract
A relation between the mass accretion rate onto the central young star and the mass of the surrounding protoplanetary disk has long been theoretically predicted and observationally sought. For the first time, we have accurately and homogeneously determined the photospheric parameters, mass accretion rate, and disk mass for an essentially complete sample of young stars with disks in the Lupus clouds. Our work combines the results of surveys conducted with VLT/X-Shooter and ALMA. With this dataset we are able to test a basic prediction of viscous accretion theory, the existence of a linear relation between the mass accretion rate onto the central star and the total disk mass. We find a correlation between the mass accretion rate and the disk dust mass, with a ratio that is roughly consistent with the expected viscous timescale when assuming an interstellar medium (ISM) gas-to-dust ratio.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
