The Chandra Galactic Bulge Survey: optical catalogue and point-source counterparts to X-ray sources
T. Wevers, S. T. Hodgkin, P. G. Jonker, C. Bassa, G. Nelemans, T. van, Grunsven, E. A. Gonzalez-Solares, M. A. P. Torres, C. Heinke, D. Steeghs, T., J. Maccarone, C. Britt, R. I. Hynes, C. Johnson, Jianfeng Wu

TL;DR
This paper presents an optical catalogue for the Chandra Galactic Bulge Survey, identifying potential optical counterparts to X-ray sources, and analyzing their properties to understand the population in the Galactic Bulge.
Contribution
The study provides a comprehensive optical catalogue and a method to identify likely X-ray source counterparts, improving the understanding of Galactic Bulge X-ray populations.
Findings
1480 candidate counterparts identified
Approximately 10% expected false positives
Many counterparts are likely foreground or Bulge sources
Abstract
As part of the Chandra Galactic Bulge Survey (GBS), we present a catalogue of optical sources in the GBS footprint. This consists of two regions centered at Galactic latitude b = 1.5 degrees above and below the Galactic Centre, spanning (l x b) = (6x1) degrees. The catalogue consists of 2 or more epochs of observations for each line of sight in r', i' and H{\alpha} filters. It is complete down to r' = 20.2 and i' = 19.2 mag; the mean 5{\sigma} depth is r' = 22.5 and i' = 21.1 mag. The mean root-mean-square residuals of the astrometric solutions is 0.04 arcsec. We cross-correlate this optical catalogue with the 1640 unique X-ray sources detected in Chandra observations of the GBS area, and find candidate optical counterparts to 1480 X-ray sources. We use a false alarm probability analysis to estimate the contamination by interlopers, and expect ~ 10 per cent of optical counterparts to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
