TL;DR
This paper introduces the instantaneous volumetric survey speed as a new figure of merit to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of transient surveys, considering their cadence, volume, and follow-up capabilities.
Contribution
It proposes a novel metric for transient survey evaluation, extends control time algorithms for multiple detections, and analyzes how survey parameters influence transient detection rates.
Findings
Many surveys are limited by available sky coverage each night.
Spectroscopic accessibility is crucial for follow-up science.
Survey speed and cadence choice impact transient detection rates.
Abstract
Time-domain surveys can exchange sky coverage for revisit frequency, complicating the comparison of their relative capabilities. By using different revisit intervals, a specific camera may execute surveys optimized for discovery of different classes of transient objects. We propose a new figure of merit, the instantaneous volumetric survey speed, for evaluating transient surveys. This metric defines the trade between cadence interval and snapshot survey volume and so provides a natural means of comparing survey capability. The related metric of areal survey speed imposes a constraint on the range of possible revisit times: we show that many modern time-domain surveys are limited by the amount of fresh sky available each night. We introduce the concept of "spectroscopic accessibility" and discuss its importance for transient science goals requiring followup observing. We present an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
