Parabolic conformally symplectic structures II; parabolic contactification
Andreas Cap, Tomas Salac

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between parabolic conformally symplectic structures and contact structures, establishing a local realization method and extending the correspondence to contact projective and conformally Fedosov structures, with implications for differential operators.
Contribution
It introduces a parabolic contactification method for PCS-structures and extends the correspondence to contact projective and conformally Fedosov structures, providing a foundation for differential operator sequences.
Findings
PCS-structures can be locally realized via parabolic contactification.
A correspondence between contact projective and conformally Fedosov structures is established.
The work sets the stage for constructing differential operator sequences associated with PCS-structures.
Abstract
Parabolic almost conformally symplectic structures were introduced in the first part of this series of articles as a class of geometric structures which have an underlying almost conformally symplectic structure. If this underlying structure is conformally symplectic, then one obtains a PCS-structure. In the current article, we relate PCS-structures to parabolic contact structures. Starting from a parabolic contact structure with a transversal infinitesimal automorphism, we first construct a natural PCS-structure on any leaf space of the corresponding foliation. Then we develop a parabolic version of contactification to show that any PCS-structure can be locally realized (uniquely up to isomorphism) in this way. In the second part of the paper, these results are extended to an analogous correspondence between contact projective structures and so-called conformally Fedosov structures.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
