The Complexity of Translationally-Invariant Spin Chains with Low Local Dimension
Johannes Bausch, Toby Cubitt, Maris Ozols

TL;DR
This paper proves that estimating the ground state energy of translationally-invariant 1D spin chains with low local dimension is computationally very hard (QMAEXP-complete), using a novel encoding of quantum computation into such systems.
Contribution
It introduces a new model for encoding quantum computation into translationally-invariant systems and extends existing techniques to allow more complex computational paths, enabling the proof of QMAEXP-completeness.
Findings
Ground state energy estimation is QMAEXP-complete for low-dimensional translationally-invariant chains.
New encoding techniques allow complex computational paths including branching and cycles.
Spectral analysis of Hamiltonians is achieved via graph Laplacians with unitary edge labels.
Abstract
We prove that estimating the ground state energy of a translationally-invariant, nearest-neighbour Hamiltonian on a 1D spin chain is QMAEXP-complete, even for systems of low local dimension (roughly 40). This is an improvement over the best previously-known result by several orders of magnitude, and it shows that spin-glass-like frustration can occur in translationally-invariant quantum systems with a local dimension comparable to the smallest-known non-translationally-invariant systems with similar behaviour. While previous constructions of such systems rely on standard models of quantum computation, we construct a new model that is particularly well-suited for encoding quantum computation into the ground state of a translationally-invariant system. This allows us to shift the proof burden from optimizing the Hamiltonian encoding a standard computational model to proving universality…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
