Colourability and word-representability of near-triangulations
Marc Elliot Glen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the word-representability of near-triangulations, establishing their 3-colorability equivalence and extending previous results on polyomino triangulations, thereby solving open problems in the field.
Contribution
It provides a shorter proof of the 3-colorability criterion for near-triangulations and generalizes prior results on polyomino triangulations, addressing open questions.
Findings
Near-triangulations are 3-colorable if and only if they are internally even.
Near-triangulations generalize polyomino triangulations studied previously.
The paper solves all open problems related to word-representability of these structures.
Abstract
A graph is word-representable if there is a word over the alphabet such that and alternate in if and only if the edge is in . It is known [6] that all -colourable graphs are word-representable, while among those with a higher chromatic number some are word-representable while others are not. There has been some recent research on the word-representability of polyomino triangulations. Akrobotu et al.[1] showed that a triangulation of a convex polyomino is word-representable if and only if it is -colourable; and Glen and Kitaev[5] extended this result to the case of a rectangular polyomino triangulation when a single domino tile is allowed. It was shown in [4] that a near-triangulation is -colourable if and only if it is internally even. This paper provides a much shorter and more elegant proof of this fact, and also shows that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
