Extra-galactic background light measurements from the far-UV to the far-IR from deep ground and space-based galaxy counts

TL;DR

This study combines multi-wavelength galaxy counts from various surveys to accurately measure the extragalactic background light, revealing discrepancies with optical direct estimates and implications for future space missions.

Contribution

It provides a comprehensive, multi-band measurement of the extragalactic background light using combined galaxy counts, addressing previous measurement discrepancies and implications for cosmic background estimates.

Findings

IGL converges for faint galaxies across all bands

Discrepancy with optical direct measurements suggests foreground contamination

Upcoming missions could measure the COB with <1% error

Abstract

We combine wide and deep galaxy number-count data from GAMA, COSMOS/G10, HST ERS, HST UVUDF and various near-, mid- and far- IR datasets from ESO, Spitzer and Herschel. The combined data range from the far-UV (0.15microns) to far-IR (500microns), and in all cases the contribution to the integrated galaxy light (IGL) of successively fainter galaxies converges. Using a simple spline fit, we derive the IGL and the extrapolated-IGL in all bands. We argue undetected low surface brightness galaxies and intra-cluster/group light is modest, and that our extrapolated-IGL measurements are an accurate representation of the extra-galactic background light. Our data agree with most earlier IGL estimates and with direct measurements in the far-IR, but disagree strongly with direct estimates in the optical. Close agreement between our results and recent very high-energy experiments (H.E.S.S. and MAGIC), suggest that there may be an additional foreground affecting the direct estimates. The most likely culprit could be the adopted Zodiacal light model. Finally we use a modified version of the two-component model to integrate the EBL and obtain measurements of the Cosmic Optical Background (COB) and Cosmic Infrared Background (CIB) of: $24^{+4}_{-4}$nWm$^{-2}$sr$^{-1}$ and $26^{+5}_{-5}$nWm$^{-2}$sr$^{-1}$ respectively (48:52%). Over the next decade, upcoming space missions such as Euclid and WFIRST, have the capacity to reduce the COB error to $<1\%$, at which point comparisons to the very high energy data could have the potential to provide a direct detection and measurement of the reionisation field.