
TL;DR
This paper establishes new upper and lower bounds on the number of edges required for distance preservers in both directed and undirected graphs, revealing how graph size and pairwise distances influence sparsity.
Contribution
It provides novel bounds on the size of distance preservers, including tight upper bounds for directed graphs and bounds involving the Ruzsa-Szemerédi function for undirected graphs.
Findings
Directed graphs have distance preservers with O(n + n^{2/3} p) edges.
Undirected graphs require O(p) edges for certain pair sets, related to the Ruzsa-Szemerédi function.
Lower bounds show that some subsets require superlinear edges to preserve all distances.
Abstract
Given node pairs in an -node graph, a distance preserver is a sparse subgraph that agrees with the original graph on all of the given pairwise distances. We prove the following bounds on the number of edges needed for a distance preserver: - Any node pairs in a directed weighted graph have a distance preserver on edges. - Any node pairs in an undirected unweighted graph have a distance preserver on edges, where is the Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi function from combinatorial graph theory. - As a lower bound, there are examples where one needs edges to preserve all pairwise distances within a subset of nodes in an undirected weighted graph. If we additionally require that the graph is unweighted, then the range of this lower bound falls slightly to $\sigma \le n^{2/3…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
