Maps of the Magellanic Clouds from Combined South Pole Telescope and Planck Data
T. M. Crawford, R. Chown, G. P. Holder, K. A. Aird, B. A. Benson, L., E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H-M. Cho, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan,, M. A. Dobbs, E. M. George, N. W. Halverson, N. L. Harrington, W. L., Holzapfel, Z. Hou, J. D. Hrubes, R. Keisler, L. Knox, A. T. Lee

TL;DR
This paper combines South Pole Telescope and Planck data to produce high-resolution, stable maps of the Magellanic Clouds across multiple wavelengths, enabling detailed astrophysical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a method for combining SPT and Planck data to create high-resolution, multi-scale maps of the Magellanic Clouds with validated calibration and consistency checks.
Findings
Maps achieve resolution down to ~1 arcmin.
Data products are consistent with Herschel HERITAGE survey.
Method improves brightness measurements across scales.
Abstract
We present maps of the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds from combined South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data. The Planck satellite observes in nine bands, while the SPT data used in this work were taken with the three-band SPT-SZ camera, The SPT-SZ bands correspond closely to three of the nine Planck bands, namely those centered at 1.4, 2.1, and 3.0 mm. The angular resolution of the Planck data ranges from 5 to 10 arcmin, while the SPT resolution ranges from 1.0 to 1.7 arcmin. The combined maps take advantage of the high resolution of the SPT data and the long-timescale stability of the space-based Planck observations to deliver robust brightness measurements on scales from the size of the maps down to ~1 arcmin. In each band, we first calibrate and color-correct the SPT data to match the Planck data, then we use noise estimates from each instrument and knowledge of each…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
