On the diamenter of Lascar strong types (after Ludomir Newelski)
Domenico Zambella

TL;DR
This paper provides an exposition of a theorem in mathematical logic demonstrating that type-definable Lascar strong types have finite diameter, based on a proof involving structure, elementary equivalence, and compactness.
Contribution
It offers a new exposition of Newelski's theorem, replacing the notion of weak c-free with the introduced concept of non-drifting.
Findings
Type-definable Lascar strong types have finite diameter.
The proof relies on structure, elementary equivalence, and compactness.
The exposition introduces the concept of non-drifting as a key notion.
Abstract
This is an exposition a theorem of mathematical logic which only assumes the notions of structure, elementary equivalence, and compactness (saturation). Newelski proved that type-definable Lascar strong types have finite diameter. Our exposition is based on a proof that appears in Pelaez' thesis - up to a minor difference: the notion of weak c-free is replaced with the notion of non-drifting that is introduced here.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
