Lowering IceCube's Energy Threshold for Point Source Searches in the Southern Sky
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J., Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, K. Andeen, T., Anderson, I. Ansseau, G. Anton, M. Archinger, C. Arguelles, T. C. Arlen, J., Auffenberg, S. Axani, X. Bai, S. W. Barwick, V. Baum, R. Bay

TL;DR
This paper improves IceCube's sensitivity to lower-energy neutrino point sources in the southern sky by selecting specific events, leading to a tenfold sensitivity increase, but no significant sources were detected.
Contribution
The study introduces a new event selection method that lowers the energy threshold for point source searches in IceCube, enhancing detection capabilities below 100 TeV.
Findings
Tenfold improvement in sensitivity to sub-100 TeV neutrino sources.
No statistically significant point sources detected.
Highest-energy event shows a 2.8 sigma deviation from background.
Abstract
Observation of a point source of astrophysical neutrinos would be a "smoking gun" signature of a cosmic-ray accelerator. While IceCube has recently discovered a diffuse flux of astrophysical neutrinos, no localized point source has been observed. Previous IceCube searches for point sources in the southern sky were restricted by either an energy threshold above a few hundred TeV or poor neutrino angular resolution. Here we present a search for southern sky point sources with greatly improved sensitivities to neutrinos with energies below 100 TeV. By selecting charged-current interacting inside the detector, we reduce the atmospheric background while retaining efficiency for astrophysical neutrino-induced events reconstructed with sub-degree angular resolution. The new event sample covers three years of detector data and leads to a factor of ten improvement in sensitivity to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
